A Brief Survey of Eschatological Views

Eschatology, the study of the ‘last things,’ is a popular area of Christian theology. It delves into Christ’s second coming, the resurrection, final judgment, and the nature of God’s kingdom. Among the various interpretations, Amillennialism stands out, providing a coherent and historically grounded framework for understanding these events. By focusing on the millennium’s symbolic nature and emphasizing Christ’s present spiritual reign, Amillennialism avoids the speculative and often fragmented approaches seen in other eschatological views. It offers a consistent and unified narrative of redemptive history, making it a reasonable and theologically sound position.

Throughout Christian history, three primary eschatological positions have emerged: Amillennialism, Postmillennialism, and Premillennialism. The 19th century saw the development of Premillennial Dispensationalism, which added a new, more literalistic framework to this conversation. Understanding the historical context of these positions is crucial to grasp their evolution. Below, we define each view and explore the significant biblical texts that inform their conclusions, demonstrating why Amillennialism remains a robust and reasonable approach.

1. Amillennialism: Amillennialism, with its roots deep in Christian history, teaches that the millennium mentioned in Revelation 20 is a symbolic period representing the current church age, in which Christ reigns spiritually through His Church. There will be no future literal thousand-year reign on earth. Instead, Christ’s second coming will mark the final judgment and the creation of a new heaven and new earth. This view emphasizes that Christ’s reign is already inaugurated and ongoing rather than something that will be established in the future. Anthony Hoekema refers to this as a “realized millennium,” where Christ’s victory over sin is presently operative.

2. Historic Premillennialism: This position holds that Christ will return before (pre-) a literal thousand-year earthly reign. Historic Premillennialism does not include a pre-tribulation rapture and instead teaches a singular return of Christ before the millennial kingdom. George Eldon Ladd argues that this view has deep roots in the early Church Fathers and anticipates a future, earthly reign of Christ during which peace and righteousness will prevail.

3. Postmillennialism: Postmillennialism asserts that Christ will return after (post-) a period of Christian influence and righteousness on earth, often identified as the millennium. The spread of the Gospel will lead to a “golden age” of peace and justice during this time. After this period, Christ will return for the final judgment. This optimistic eschatological view was prevalent among Puritan theologians and Reformed thinkers.

4. Premillennial Dispensationalism: Developed in the 19th century by John Nelson Darby, Premillennial Dispensationalism teaches that Christ will return twice: first in a secret rapture of the Church before a seven-year tribulation and then to establish a literal thousand-year reign on earth. Dispensationalists maintain a sharp distinction between God’s plan for Israel and His plan for the Church, interpreting many prophetic texts as literal future events. Charles Ryrie and Cyrus Scofield were instrumental in popularizing this view, particularly through the Scofield Reference Bible.

Primary Texts Used to Arrive at These Conclusions

Each eschatological view is shaped by how it understands particular biblical texts. Amillennialism offers a consistent interpretation that focuses on prophecy’s symbolic and theological dimensions, contrasting with the literalistic readings of obviously symbolic texts found with Premillennial Dispensationalism. Below are the significant texts that shape these eschatological frameworks:

1. Revelation 20:1-6: The thousand-year reign described in Revelation 20 is a central point of scholarly debate in eschatological studies. Amillennialists interpret the millennium symbolically, seeing it as the current church age where Christ reigns spiritually. In contrast, both Historic and Dispensational Premillennialists interpret the passage literally, expecting a future earthly reign. Postmillennialists view this as a coming period of Christian dominance preceding Christ’s return.

2. 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18: This text discusses the “rapture,” where believers will meet Christ in the air. Dispensationalists view this as a separate event that occurs before the tribulation. At the same time, Amillennialists, Historic Premillennialists, and Postmillennialists see it as a description of the singular second coming of Christ at the end of the age.

3. Matthew 24 (The Olivet Discourse): In this discourse, Jesus speaks of the destruction of Jerusalem and His return. Amillennialists and Historic Premillennialists interpret much of the discourse as fulfilled in A.D. 70 with the fall of Jerusalem, seeing it as a past event with continuing significance for the Church. On the other hand, Dispensationalists view this discourse as primarily referring to future tribulation events. Scholars like N.T. Wright argues that much of the language here is apocalyptic and should be understood symbolically, emphasizing its first-century fulfillment.

4. Daniel 9:24-27 (The Seventy Weeks): Dispensationalists view this prophecy as predicting a seven-year tribulation before Christ’s second coming. Amillennialists and Historic Premillennialists, however, often see this prophecy as fulfilled in Christ’s first coming and the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, interpreting it within its historical context without inserting a “gap” between the 69th and 70th weeks.

5. Romans 11: This chapter addresses Israel’s future. Dispensationalists argue that Paul foresees a future national restoration of Israel. At the same time, Amillennialists interpret this as the inclusion of Jews into the Church, understanding the fulfillment of God’s promises as occurring through Christ and extending to all who believe, Jew and Gentile alike.

6. Genesis 12 and Galatians 3:16 (Promises to Abraham): Dispensationalists claim that the land promise to Abraham remains unfulfilled and will be realized in the future. In contrast, Amillennialists and Postmillennialists argue that these promises are fulfilled in Christ, as Paul states in Galatians 3:16, where the promises made to Abraham’s offspring are applied to Christ and, by extension, to all believers.

Conclusion

Amillennialism presents the most consistent and theologically sound framework for understanding eschatology. Interpreting key biblical texts in their historical and theological context avoids the speculative and fragmented nature of Premillennial Dispensationalism. Instead of focusing on a future, literal kingdom, Amillennialism emphasizes the present reign of Christ and the fulfillment of God’s promises through His redemptive work. This view upholds the unity of Scripture, respecting the continuity between the Old and New Testaments, and provides a cohesive vision of Christ’s ongoing kingdom, making it a reasonable and credible approach to Christian eschatology.

~PW 🌮🛶

Bibliography

• Blomberg, C. L., Seal, D. M., & Duprée, A. M. (2021). From Pentecost to Patmos: Acts To Revelation (Second Edition, Vol. 2). Apollos.
• Davie, M., Grass, T., Holmes, S. R., McDowell, J., & Noble, T. A., eds. (2016). In New Dictionary of Theology: Historical and Systematic (Second Edition). Inter-Varsity Press; InterVarsity Press.
• Hughes, R. T., & Gorman, J. L. (2024). Reviving the Ancient Faith: The Story of Churches of Christ in America(Third Edition). William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
• Jenkins, F., ed. (1994). Overcoming with the Lamb: Lessons from the Book of Revelation. Florida College Bookstore.
• Köstenberger, A. J., Kellum, L. S., & Quarles, C. L. (2016). The Cradle, the Cross, and the Crown: An Introduction to the New Testament. B&H Academic.
• Ryrie, C. C. (1999). Basic Theology: A Popular Systematic Guide to Understanding Biblical Truth. Moody Press.
• Thiessen, H. C., & Doerksen, V. D. (1979). Lectures in systematic theology. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
• Virkler, H. A., & Ayayo, K. G. (2007). Hermeneutics: principles and processes of Biblical interpretation (2nd ed.). Baker Academic.