Moral statements and positions will, necessarily, impact political issues. This is not because morality is inherently political, but because government has the task of recognizing the difference between good and evil, so moral issues will have to be dealt with (Rom 13:3-4). This means that, contrary to what is so often stated and argued, morality will be legislated by government, and it will be legislated from a worldview that either recognizes the significance of God or not. To say that God needs to be kept out of politics, then, is to default to the secularized view of morality; and secularized morality will then be legislated. Why is it that people default to keeping God out of it instead of keeping the secularized views of reality out of it? And why do some Christians seem to be buying into all of this?
We need to see what has happened here. Many have bought into the notions that 1) God and religion must be kept out of politics, and 2) morality is not something that can be legislated. In fact, both are false. God is never out of politics, and we are fooling ourselves if we think so, given that God rules in the kingdoms of men. Every worldview says something about God. If a worldview says there is no God, then a notion of God is still a part of the position, and actions will be taken that demonstrate that disbelief. Further, every law is a legislation of morality in one form or another; there is no way around it. The question is, will the legislation come from those whose worldview respects God as the foundation or not?
I don’t say all of this in order to argue that Christians need to get more political. I’m arguing that Christians need to say more about God and morality in every area of life. We don’t check our God at the door when we enter a political arena, and we don’t set aside godly morals when we engage the culture. We don’t take a moral view of something based on politics, but surely our political views ought to be based on godly morality. The point then is not that we need more political activists. The point is that we need to be more engaged in the moral discussions of our culture and take a stand for what is right, regardless of political fallout. In other words, it’s not about being political; it’s about standing for what’s right in the middle of a crooked and perverse generation.
Even more, we need to hold up the gospel itself to the world. The answer to our problems is not to vote in or out this or that politician. No government in history has been a bastion of godliness, and I don’t expect that to change. The answer is always where it has been: in Christ. The problems of this world won’t be fixed by human government, but by the gospel. “The kingdoms of earth pass away one by one, but the kingdom of heaven remains.”
So Christians should be concerned with 1) holding out the gospel to a lost world, and 2) standing up for Christ and His morality. It’s not politics. It’s just what’s right.
Effective January 1 2014 The BSA’s policy will now allow boys who wish to participate in Scouting regardless of “sexual orientation or preference”
As a boy I enjoyed Cub Scouts and a brief stint in Boy Scouts, my sons are in scouting where I presently serve as an Assistant Scoutmaster, and an adult leader for my youngest’s pack. When scouting asked my opinion on the proposed change this year I wrote this to the “key three”:
I realize you may be receiving a very high level of comments regarding this particular subject but I hope you will take time to consider my comments. As a parent, former scout, and now an adult leader involved actively with both the local Boy Scouts and Cub Scouts, I am very troubled by the recent announcement concerning the review of the BSA’s national membership standards.
As a parent, the safety of the boys is paramount, the BSA expended considerable resources, time and effort not only creating the very best Youth Protection training, but also fighting the tough legal battle to allow the BSA to continue to follow those same principles it has held for 100 years. The allowance for openly gay, transgender, or otherwise described participants places the boys at great risk. Not only from pedophiles but also the more common and less discussed ephebophiles (adults who are sexually attracted to post-pubescent youths, generally aged 12 to 17.) With the door opened up you will have an increasing amount of leadership positions sought for this very goal and a decline in both the number of willing parents to volunteer, and more pointedly the scouts themselves will drop in number as their families wisely move them away from such dangers. Can you imagine the outcry if a single straight man was to lead a group of post pubescent teen girls?
As a scout leader, I applaud the shift back to localism that this seems to create, but the real chaos will occur when those troop attend council, state and national events, Will the staff at those venues be held to any standard at all, and if so what will it be. I will not be sending my boys to an outing where there will be active homosexuals in close contact with them. With it already being difficult to find boys willing to actively promote their participation in scouts at the high school age, this choice will further ostracize them and be one more obstacle to climb over.
Finally, as a Christian this choice goes against the simplicity of God’s design for man, if my voices matters please consider it opposed fully to this course of action
So now what. They tossed out the initial plan and came back with this “compromise”. Frankly it’s bad policy no matter how one feels about this issue. Whomever came up with the idea should really explain WHY they think this is good for the growth of scouting, it’s legacy and mission. It’s a change that does little to help any of the issues confronting scouting today, and really makes it more difficult on everyone.
In a practical way I don’t expect to see some massive rush of boys who wanted to be in scouts suddenly showing up and saying let me join in. Think it through, 70% of troops are charted by some from of “faith” based group, the adult leadership comes from that pool, and even in the other troops the BSA still requires all members to be Reverent and hold a faith in a higher power of some sort. Given that case, how many boys will want to join a group full of adults and boys who hold that their sexual desires are an unnatural abomination. Does the BSA somehow think that magically all the socially conservative adults that make up the core of scouting’s volunteers are just going to “change” with the wind. Do they really think that teen age boys are going to want to go camping with boys who find them “attractive”.
I get that some folks were concerned about the decline in scouting’s numbers, but this issue does nothing to solve it. We as a nation are becoming soft, kids would rather (on average) play video games, or watch TV than step into the wild. Culture tells them this EVERY day. Scouting done right means getting outside, and an electronic culture is killing the manhood of our youth one digital bit at a time. No policy change could have fixed this.
I don’t see this as a money issue either, with a dampened economy corporations will not be spilling cash back in the coffers anytime soon, (if ever) the Rabid Liberals will still hate the BSA until they allow adults who go against nature in as leaders. (really I just think they want to kill scouting altogether. If they wanted to make it better, they would just build their own group, fund it and make it “better” than the BSA.) If it was really a money issue, tack on $10 in membership dues, tell us why and we would have gladly paid it.
What then will I do…
Well for now I am staying with scouting, it still is the best framework around that allows me to teach leadership not only to my son’s but others as well. If asked by a boy or a parent what I think about Homosexual behavior my response will not have changed. I will still open the Bible turn to the New Testament and show them what the text says:
“Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God.” ~ 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 (NASB)
(please note this comes not from the Law that was nailed to the Cross, but the one enacted by the blood of the savior so don’t fall for the trap that tries to present the lie that homosexual behavior is only condemned in the Old Testament)
Further, if someone asks how could I be a part of a group where they are okay with this abhorrent behavior… Well I still live in a nation that allows the murder of unborn children, calls fornication “cool” and makes it be “exciting” entertainment… I do so because Scouting is not the church, though populated by professed believers, it is not and can not be the church, Christ has but one, and he is the head of it, not some “key three” or a voting block at a rally.
I wrote you in my letter not to associate with immoral people;
I did not at all mean with the immoral people of this world, or with the covetous and swindlers, or with idolaters; for then you would have to go out of the world.
But actually, I wrote to you not to associate with any so-called brother if he should be an immoral person, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or a swindler– not even to eat with such a one.
For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Do you not judge those who are within the church? ~ 1 Corinthians 5:9-12 (NASB)
I choose to follow this course knowing that where illness is, a healer is needed. I will stay as long as my sons want to participate and the pack/troop will have me knowing who I am and what I believe.
“And when the Pharisees saw this, they said to His disciples, “Why is your Teacher eating with the tax-gatherers and sinners?”
But when He heard this, He said, “It is not those who are healthy who need a physician, but those who are sick.” ~ Matthew 9:11-12 (NASB)